From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Sun Jun 05 2005 - 17:55:28 GMT-3
=============
quoted
Thanks for checking this out. These inconsistencies make life difficult!
=============
eheh, and that was said by a very competent guy on the network world (and very nice, thanks for all replies) that already passed the lab.
For who is still trying to pass, lets laugh instead of cry about it. (hope Cisco reads this list and correct the problems that are pointed here; I think they should pay Paul and guys like Scott and Bob for this work:))
It remembers me the inconsistency about logging with Reverse Path check I run in through this week. If log keyword is used on the access-list, 26xx and 36xx with 12.2T does not let the packed pass (on access-list with permit). If the log keyword is removed, it works fine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3