From: Ефременко
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 14:26:49 GMT-3
Hello,
I makes some tests and find following:
Script like this
tclsh
foreach CCIE {
10.1.1.1
10.2.2.2
10.3.3.3
10.4.4.4
10.5.5.5
10.6.6.6
} {ping $CCIE}
works well on my Cisco3640 but it did not work on my Cisco 2800 series routers
---
Best regards,
Alexey Yefremenko
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> thomas.rader@freesurf.ch
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:13 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Testing with TCLSH
>
> Hello Gary,
>
> I don't understand why this works on my routers, and not on yours !
>
> What IOS are you using ?
>
> I'm using 12.2.15(T16)
>
> R1R1#show flash:
> System flash directory:
> File Length Name/status
> 1 15192212 c2600-is4-mz.122-15.T16.bin
> [15192276 bytes used, 1584940 available, 16777216 total]
> 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
> R1R1#
>
>
> Now I'm worried that my script won't run properly in the lab!
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cheung, Gary YY [mailto:gary.yy.cheung@pccw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:03 PM
> To: thomas.rader@freesurf.ch; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Testing with TCLSH
>
> My understanding on "puts" is just like the "print" command in most of
> programming language.
>
> I had tried your script on my routers before but it won't work. After I
> used
> the script with "puts", it works fine in both my lab and real exam.
>
> Regards
> Gary Cheung
> CCIE#14642, BEng, CEng, MIEE, PMP, PRINCE2,
> CISSP, MCSE, SCSA, SCNA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> thomas.rader@freesurf.ch
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:53 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Testing with TCLSH
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand what the "puts" command does and why it should not
> having
> it should stop my script from working.
>
> I've been using the following script for a while now, and it seems to work
> just fine.
>
> tclsh
> foreach CCIE {
> 10.1.1.1
> 10.2.2.2
> 10.3.3.3
> 10.4.4.4
> 10.5.5.5
> 10.6.6.6
> } {ping $CCIE}
>
>
>
> Here is the output of my script:
>
> R1R1#tclsh
> R1R1#foreach CCIE {
> +>10.1.1.1
> +>10.2.2.2
> +>10.3.3.3
> +>10.4.4.4
> +>10.5.5.5
> +>10.6.6.6
> +>} {ping $CCIE}
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/4 ms
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/3/4 ms
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.4.4.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 60/60/60 ms
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.5.5.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 60/60/61 ms
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 60/60/60 ms
> R1R1#
>
>
> Are you saying that without using the "puts" command I might have problems
> on the lab ? Please help!
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Cheung [mailto:garymsue@netvigator.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 7:03 PM
> To: Dillon Yang; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Failed again!
>
> Since most people sent mail asked me about the TCLSH, I would like to
> share
> it for you all.
>
> In Cisco CCIE blueprint, all the routers in the lab are either Cisco 26xx
> or
> 37xx and these types of routers can support TCL language. It is very
> helpful
> when you want to test the reachability. Prior to start the script, you
> need
> to dig out all the IP addresses that you want to test or listed in the
> diagram. I suggest you using a notepad and the script will like this.
> tclsh
> foreach addr {
> 10.1.1.1
> 10.1.1.3
> 10.2.2.2
> 10.3.3.3
> .....
> } {puts [exec "ping $addr"]}
>
> - You SHOULD add "puts" before executing the ping commands, otherwise, it
> wouldn't print out the result to you. Dillion - you may encounter this
> problem.
>
> After completing the script, you just copy and paste it into the prompt -
> router#. Then you will get the ping result of each address. You need to
> check which address is PING fails, and see whether this is a normal case.
> PLEASE don't forget those SUCCESSFUL PINGs, you need to check whether it
> performs right, may be FAIL should be the right answer.
>
> Remember to run the script in each router (Catalyst 3550 won't support it)
> and ensure the meaning of FULL REACHABILITY.
>
> Besides, you need to test it TWICE, one for FR up/ISDN down and one for
> ISDN
> up/FR down.
>
> Before run the "ISDN TEST CALL", you should check the "SHOW ISDN STATUS"
> first and ensure the SPID is valid. Otherwise, you need to REBOOT the
> router.
>
> Hope this help you.
>
> Regards
> Gary Cheung
> CCIE#14642, BEng, CEng, MIEE, PMP, PRINCE2,
> CISSP, MCSE, SCSA, SCNA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Dillon Yang
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 4:45 PM
> To: Gary Cheung
> Subject: Re: Failed again!
>
>
> Hi, Gary:
>
> Congratulations first!
> The TCLSH is a very trouble. The routers CAN NOT SUPPORT the
> command "foreach" since I can execute the single "rsh $rt show run" as
> the document made by B.Caslow in the NMC www page. The version of the
> routers are all 12.1(14) with something "i5qxxx" on c2600.
> So I have to do the connectivity test by sampling mentioned by
> B.Sinclair, its maybe not so complete. IT IS A VERY PITY!
> The second strange thing puzzling me is that the command "ISDN TEST
> CALL interface" that mentioned by B.Caslow in the checklist to Jongsoo
> DID NOT work on ONE router while the other is OK. Unluckily the few
> points ISDN cost me about 40 minutes or more.
> After BGP, it passed about 5 hours or more. I did not get all
> scores of BGP since the BGP table and connectivity is ok.
>
> TIA
>
> dillon
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:40 GMT-3