From: Tom Nooning (t.nooning@insightbb.com)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 21:57:34 GMT-3
Don't know their origin per se, but I have seen some strange behavior with
the WIC-1DSU-T1-V2's on 2600 and 2800 platforms. Bug links here:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCeh30146&cco_product=IOS&fset=&swver=&keyw=WIC-1DSU-T1-V2&target=&train=
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCsa55375&cco_product=IOS&fset=&swver=&keyw=WIC-1DSU-T1-V2&target=&train=-Tom----- Original Message -----From: "Long Kwok" <lkwok@ccieunix.com>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:01 PMSubject: v2 Cisco network modules and cards> Hi>> I see all these new cisco v2 network modules and line cards such as> wic-dsu-t1-v2 , I have head two different stories about what/why these> are , as if you have to be aware which chassis does / does not support> these newer v2 cards..>>>> 1- v2 cards were developed for ISR platforms which have supposed> higher performance blah blah blah.>> 2- V2 cards were developed to stop the conterfieting cisco ring in> china , so v2 has propietory chips on them that are harder to clone>>>> Any thoughts ??>>>> TIA , Long>> _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at:> http://www.groupstudy.co!
m/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:02 GMT-3