From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 21:20:39 GMT-3
Thanks for the reply Stephen.
What you saw is because queueing is not supported on ethernet
subintefaces.
To allow it, we have to "simulate" a queue. This is done with a parent
Policy that shapes all traffic. This creates a queueing and a child policy
can be called under the parent police. This works fine.
This site give us a workable example about this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080114326.shtml
Cordially,
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gladston
Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@yahoo.com>
25/05/2005 19:49
To
Alaerte Gladston Vidali/Brazil/IBM@IBMBR
cc
Subject
Re: Inconsistency on CB Classification
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 05:01:14PM -0400, gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:
> I have notice some inconsistency on IOS related to QoS match under CB.
> For example, the following works if configured under physical
> interface. But if configured under logical interface, it does not
> match. Using match access-group and then using an access-list to match
> Telnet, it works with subinterfaces.
I ran into this issue last night on a 2620. I applied the
service-policy in one direction on an Ethernet sub-interface and it
wouldn't show up in the configuration, if I applied it to the other
direction it would say not supported on virtual or subinterfaces. I
presumed it was a lack of a feature instead of a bug.. there are lots of
inconsistencies that I'm seeing in 12.2T code and especially in QoS.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:02 GMT-3