Re: RE: Bc and Be

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Mon May 23 2005 - 20:38:14 GMT-3

• Next message: John Matus: "rip default route"
• Previous message: Serge N'GBESSO: "VPNC ASBR Redistribution Issue"
• Maybe in reply to: simon hart: "RE: Bc and Be"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: RE: Bc and Be"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Oh, thanks a lot, this discussion really went to the point.

It shades same light on more than one year doubts.

Unfortunatelly, as Simon said, it seems QoS is not coherent across IOS versions.

Here is my summary:

CAR
    Be must be greater than bc to have a value

CB
    Be can be lower than bc to have a valid value

If not configuring violate-action, we are doing single rate-three color
marker (RFC 2697).

If configuring violate-action, we are doing Three Color Marker scheme with two token buckets.

Shaping
    Be can be of any value.

Any inconsistency here?

• Next message: John Matus: "rip default route"
• Previous message: Serge N'GBESSO: "VPNC ASBR Redistribution Issue"
• Maybe in reply to: simon hart: "RE: Bc and Be"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: RE: Bc and Be"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:00 GMT-3