From: Mihai Petcu (mpetcu2004@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon May 23 2005 - 15:24:00 GMT-3
Lanny,
Probably you should also configure "vpdn enable" in global config on both client and server.
HTH,
Mihai
simon hart <simon.hart@btinternet.com> wrote:
Lanny,
It looks as if on your VT and Dialer you have not configured PPP as the
encapsulation method. I did lab up the exact same scenario as yourself a
while ago, and managed to get it working, however from memory I am sure I
had ppp encapsulation on the dialer and VT interfaces
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Lanny Ballard
Sent: 23 May 2005 14:32
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: PPPoE testing
On to PPPoE...
Once again I am trying to verify and troubleshoot a basic pppoe example.
I have PPPoE over Ethernet and a PPPoE client
While debugging, I see the PADI, PADO, PADR, and PADS exchange. and it
seems like it's creating a pppoe tunnel, but I can't seem to ping across the
interfaces. Can someone help fill in the missing gaps for me? I have gone
over Cisco's documentation but to no avail.
Here are my configs
R1 (PPPoE over Ethernet)
vpdn-group test
accept-dialin
protocol pppoe
virtual-template 1
pppoe limit per-mac 10
interface Ethernet1/0
no ip address
half-duplex
pppoe enable
interface Virtual-Template1
mtu 1492
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
R2 (PPPoE client)
vpdn-group test
request-dialin
protocol pppoe
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
pppoe enable
pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
interface Dialer1
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
TIA!
Lanny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:00 GMT-3