Re: Snmp and Link-status notification

From: san (san.study@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 21 2005 - 22:19:53 GMT-3


Simon,

According to my understanding, bgp on the host commands makes it to
send only bgp.
Can you try without "bgp" at end of host command. (I would assume then
it will send link-status, according GS archives)

/SAN

On 5/21/05, simon hart <simon.hart@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been through the archives here at GS and have noticed some
> significant discussion on this topic, with general census of opinion being
> that if you enter the following command:-
>
> snmp-server host 192.168.0.100 public bgp
> snmp-server enable traps bgp
>
> That you have to turn off snmp link-status on each interface as this trap is
> not filtered out when applying arguments to the ends of snmp-server
> statements. (That is if you are required to only send one kind of trap).
>
> I have since tested this out on my home lab, and it really does not appear
> to be the case. If I debug snmp packet with the commands above configured,
> I can pull interfaces left right and centre without generating an snmp trap.
> Only if I take the arguments out does snmp packets get generated for Link
> Status (as I would expect), as by doing so I have enabled snmp-server enable
> traps snmp by default and thus will generate RFC 1157 traps.
>
> I am keen to understand whether this is correct, as past info on GS seems to
> contradict this and the DocCd is not that clear on the matter.
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.14 - Release Date: 20/05/2005
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:00 GMT-3