From: simon hart (simon.hart@btinternet.com)
Date: Sat May 21 2005 - 18:50:23 GMT-3
Gladston,
I see where you are coming from. It would be better phrased (IMHO)
If you apply this policy to a link where the maximum reserved bandwidth is
1Mbps...........................................
Also this would work where the configured MinCir for the Frame relay link
was 1Mbps
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
gladston@br.ibm.com
Sent: 21 May 2005 21:49
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: GOOD URL: MQC comparing between bandwidth vs priority command
Thanks,
Would you think that this phrase on the Doc could be rephrased?
=========================
policy-map foo
class bar
bandwidth percent 30
class baz
bandwidth percent 60
If you apply this policy to a 1 Mbps link, it means that 300 kbps is
guaranteed to class bar, and 600 kbps is guaranteed to class baz.
Importantly, 100 kbps is leftover for class-default.
===========================
With:
That is true if applyed to a Frame-Relay, where max-reserved-bandwidth
command is not supported.
If applyed to ATM or Ethernet, the service-policy command will not be
accepted because only 75% of the interface bandwidth can be used by default.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:00 GMT-3