isis metric-style transition

From: Mark Lasarko (mlasarko@co.ba.md.us)
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 15:29:52 GMT-3

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Question for Juniper Config Expert"
• Previous message: Dave Bregman: "RE: ISDN Basic-Net 3"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Greetings GS,

Aside from the extra TLV's generated...
Is it a good idea to use this option in the lab?
Are there other reasons we should stick to "wide"?

TIA,
~M

BTW - I also noticed this recent memo relating to the subject:
M-ISIS: Multi Topology (MT) Routing in IS-IS
http://bgp.potaroo.net/ietf/ids/draft-ietf-isis-wg-multi-topology-10.txt

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Question for Juniper Config Expert"
• Previous message: Dave Bregman: "RE: ISDN Basic-Net 3"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: isis metric-style transition"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:59 GMT-3