From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Wed May 18 2005 - 12:49:19 GMT-3
Thanks Scott, but IGP's are hop based in IPV4 aswell but they use the normal
reachable outside ip address.
It's bugging me............
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: 18 May 2005 16:40
To: 'Lee Donald'
Subject: RE: IPV6 Link Local FE80
All IGPs are next-hop-based. And the most stable (unchanging) version of a
local-link next-hop address is the link-local with IPv6.
At least that's my interpretation of the theory and RFC!
HTH,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Lee
Donald
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 11:26 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPV6 Link Local FE80
Can anybody tell me why on frame-relay, using RIPng for instance does the
rip route in the table point towards the link local of the originating
router? Shouldn't this route come from the global address of the originating
router?
I know how to get it working over frame, by having a frame-map to the global
and then a frame map to the link local of the remote but I would like to
know why?
Any takers?
Thanks in advance.
Lee.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:58 GMT-3