RE: A bit OT - tunnel vs internet

From: Richard Dumoulin (Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr)
Date: Tue May 17 2005 - 19:23:05 GMT-3


Hmm, maybe I answered too quickly. I did not see "consistently".
Are you pinging the routers private IP addresses or hosts IP addresses?

-- Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: libone mhlanga [mailto:libone@lycos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:17 AM
To: Richard Dumoulin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: A bit OT - tunnel vs internet

Would "rate limiting" affect round trips ?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Dumoulin" <Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr>
To: "libone mhlanga" <libone@lycos.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: A bit OT - tunnel vs internet
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:26:24 +0100

>
> The ISP is rate limiting ICMP but not IPSec?
> Just an idea,
>
> -- Richard
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: libone mhlanga [mailto:libone@lycos.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:23 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: A bit OT - tunnel vs internet
>
> Sorry this is a bit OT but here is the problem :-
>
> a) two routers on the internet each with an RFC1918 address on the inside
> b) ipsec tunnel between them to only tunnel the private address range
>
> Issue:-
>
> a ping between the private addresses is consistantly about 100ms or so
> faster than a ping between the public interfaces yet I would expect it to
be
> other way round ? no ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Li
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites
at
> once.
> http://datingsearch.lycos.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and
> not necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted
> with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended
> recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised
> that you have received this email in error and that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned
> with the content of this email please e-mail to:
> e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the
> sender has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk,
> we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a
> result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus
> checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

-- 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:58 GMT-3