From: Dillon Yang (dillony@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 13 2005 - 20:41:42 GMT-3
Hi, Gary:
Thanks for your reply.
1. Yes, I did not use the " puts" for I had not used it in my home
lab with successful result. I'll add the " puts" next time, But the
IOS 12.1 IS something strange.
2. ISDN status is OK. I DID see the spid sent and spid is valid.
But, Did you bring it up with the same spid on 2 B channel?
TIA
dillon
On 5/14/05, Gary Cheung <garymsue@netvigator.com> wrote:
> Since most people sent mail asked me about the TCLSH, I would like to share it for you all.
>
> In Cisco CCIE blueprint, all the routers in the lab are either Cisco 26xx or 37xx and these types of routers can support TCL language. It is very helpful when you want to test the reachability. Prior to start the script, you need to dig out all the IP addresses that you want to test or listed in the diagram. I suggest you using a notepad and the script will like this.
> tclsh
> foreach addr {
> 10.1.1.1
> 10.1.1.3
> 10.2.2.2
> 10.3.3.3
> .....
> } {puts [exec "ping $addr"]}
>
> - You SHOULD add "puts" before executing the ping commands, otherwise, it wouldn't print out the result to you. Dillion - you may encounter this problem.
>
> After completing the script, you just copy and paste it into the prompt - router#. Then you will get the ping result of each address. You need to check which address is PING fails, and see whether this is a normal case. PLEASE don't forget those SUCCESSFUL PINGs, you need to check whether it performs right, may be FAIL should be the right answer.
>
> Remember to run the script in each router (Catalyst 3550 won't support it) and ensure the meaning of FULL REACHABILITY.
>
> Besides, you need to test it TWICE, one for FR up/ISDN down and one for ISDN up/FR down.
>
> Before run the "ISDN TEST CALL", you should check the "SHOW ISDN STATUS" first and ensure the SPID is valid. Otherwise, you need to REBOOT the router.
>
> Hope this help you.
>
> Regards
> Gary Cheung
> CCIE#14642, BEng, CEng, MIEE, PMP, PRINCE2,
> CISSP, MCSE, SCSA, SCNA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Dillon Yang
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 4:45 PM
> To: Gary Cheung
> Cc: Oliver Steudler; GS
> Subject: Re: Failed again!
>
> Hi, Gary:
>
> Congratulations first!
> The TCLSH is a very trouble. The routers CAN NOT SUPPORT the
> command "foreach" since I can execute the single "rsh $rt show run" as
> the document made by B.Caslow in the NMC www page. The version of the
> routers are all 12.1(14) with something "i5qxxx" on c2600.
> So I have to do the connectivity test by sampling mentioned by
> B.Sinclair, its maybe not so complete. IT IS A VERY PITY!
> The second strange thing puzzling me is that the command "ISDN TEST
> CALL interface" that mentioned by B.Caslow in the checklist to Jongsoo
> DID NOT work on ONE router while the other is OK. Unluckily the few
> points ISDN cost me about 40 minutes or more.
> After BGP, it passed about 5 hours or more. I did not get all
> scores of BGP since the BGP table and connectivity is ok.
>
> TIA
>
> dillon
>
> On 5/13/05, Gary Cheung <garymsue@netvigator.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dillon & Oliver
> >
> > I also have the same feeling with you all during my fail in first attempt. My experience teached me "Don't do more than the requirements that want you do!, it is not a test of best practices". Have you used the TCLSH to test the reachability during the exam? You must do it at least two times, 1 for normal and 1 for FR down (ISDN up).
> >
> > Keep on!!! You will get it.
> >
> > Regards
> > Gary Cheung
> > CCIE#14642, BEng, CEng, MIEE, PMP, PRINCE2,
> > CISSP, MCSE, SCSA, SCNA
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Dillon Yang
> > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:04 AM
> > To: Oliver Steudler
> > Cc: GS
> > Subject: Re: Failed again!
> >
> > Hi, Oliver:
> >
> > Thanks! So, did you get it at the 4th?
> > Yes, I did finish the IPv6 part and tested it. But I cant believe the
> > not 100% of IGP, it is surprising.
> >
> > TIA
> > dillon
> >
> > On 5/13/05, Oliver Steudler <oliver@steudler.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello Dillon,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I know how you feel!!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've been four times. The last two times, I was convinced I had nailed it!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Was it the IPv6 stuff that got you, or what are you unsure about your score
> > > ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've spent quite a bit of time analyzing my own work and the scores Cisco
> > > gave me for it. Some stuff I agree with, but the most not at all !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers, Oliver
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Basel, Switzerland
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Dillon Yang
> > >
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:55 PM
> > >
> > > To: GS; Ed Lui
> > >
> > > Subject: Failed again!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, group:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's a pity.
> > >
> > > Who can tell me whether I can get the scores if all the
> > >
> > > configuration are correct but without entire verification?
> > >
> > > I'm getting into knots.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > dillon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > >
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:58 GMT-3