From: Dillon Yang (dillony@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 13 2005 - 05:45:02 GMT-3
Hi, Gary:
Congratulations first!
The TCLSH is a very trouble. The routers CAN NOT SUPPORT the
command "foreach" since I can execute the single "rsh $rt show run" as
the document made by B.Caslow in the NMC www page. The version of the
routers are all 12.1(14) with something "i5qxxx" on c2600.
So I have to do the connectivity test by sampling mentioned by
B.Sinclair, its maybe not so complete. IT IS A VERY PITY!
The second strange thing puzzling me is that the command "ISDN TEST
CALL interface" that mentioned by B.Caslow in the checklist to Jongsoo
DID NOT work on ONE router while the other is OK. Unluckily the few
points ISDN cost me about 40 minutes or more.
After BGP, it passed about 5 hours or more. I did not get all
scores of BGP since the BGP table and connectivity is ok.
TIA
dillon
On 5/13/05, Gary Cheung <garymsue@netvigator.com> wrote:
> Hi Dillon & Oliver
>
> I also have the same feeling with you all during my fail in first attempt. My experience teached me "Don't do more than the requirements that want you do!, it is not a test of best practices". Have you used the TCLSH to test the reachability during the exam? You must do it at least two times, 1 for normal and 1 for FR down (ISDN up).
>
> Keep on!!! You will get it.
>
> Regards
> Gary Cheung
> CCIE#14642, BEng, CEng, MIEE, PMP, PRINCE2,
> CISSP, MCSE, SCSA, SCNA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Dillon Yang
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: Oliver Steudler
> Cc: GS
> Subject: Re: Failed again!
>
> Hi, Oliver:
>
> Thanks! So, did you get it at the 4th?
> Yes, I did finish the IPv6 part and tested it. But I cant believe the
> not 100% of IGP, it is surprising.
>
> TIA
> dillon
>
> On 5/13/05, Oliver Steudler <oliver@steudler.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello Dillon,
> >
> >
> >
> > I know how you feel!!
> >
> >
> >
> > I've been four times. The last two times, I was convinced I had nailed it!
> >
> >
> >
> > Was it the IPv6 stuff that got you, or what are you unsure about your score
> > ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I've spent quite a bit of time analyzing my own work and the scores Cisco
> > gave me for it. Some stuff I agree with, but the most not at all !
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers, Oliver
> >
> >
> >
> > Basel, Switzerland
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Dillon Yang
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:55 PM
> >
> > To: GS; Ed Lui
> >
> > Subject: Failed again!
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi, group:
> >
> >
> >
> > It's a pity.
> >
> > Who can tell me whether I can get the scores if all the
> >
> > configuration are correct but without entire verification?
> >
> > I'm getting into knots.
> >
> >
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > dillon
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:57 GMT-3