RE: spanning-tree vlan 10 port-priority vs swithport allowed

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon May 09 2005 - 20:05:26 GMT-3


Mani,

Come on, guy. I know you know which is better.

Think about what happens if one of the links goes down with each method.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of mani
poopal
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 6:44 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: spanning-tree vlan 10 port-priority vs swithport allowed vlan

Hi Group,
I have a question in tunking.
-Asssume sw1 is connected to sw2 via fa 0/23 and fa 0/24 both isl
trunking(not etherchannel)
-There are vlan 10, 20 and 30 defined.
-For all the vlan sw1 is the root
 
If the task ask us to send the vlan 10 through fa 0/24 trunk(default it will
go through fa 0/23 trunk), what is the solutions. Please look at the
following both solutions and give your thoughsts
 
method1:
sw1:
int fa 0/24
spannig-tree vlan 10 port-priority 96 (less than 128)
 
mehod2:
sw1/sw2
int fa 0/24
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10
int fa 0/23
switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,30
 
guys what is the difference between both methods, according to my knowledge,
both accomplishes the same goal, any thoughts.
 
thanks
 
Mani

                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
 Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:57 GMT-3