From: John Matus (john_matus@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri May 06 2005 - 00:07:29 GMT-3
ok....for those of you w/ solution guides....
the solution guide takes the qos requirements for icmp and nests them in a
service-policy under the class-default. is there really a difference
between creating 2 classes and defining the traffic engineering under each
as opposed to having 1 class default and nesting service policies inside
them?? i don't quite understand - but hey, this isn't the 1st time i have't
understood :)
class-map match-all voip
match access-group 101
class-map match-all icmp
match protocol icmp
class-map match-all bb2
!
!
policy-map voip
class voip
priority percent 50
policy-map bb2
class voip
set dscp ef
class icmp
police cir 16000
class class-default
police cir 2500000
set dscp ef
policy-map bb3
class icmp
police cir 16000
class class-default
police cir 3000000
set dscp ef
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3