From: John Matus (john_matus@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 05 2005 - 18:00:18 GMT-3
yes, i understand brian. i was mainly interested in protocol numbers as an
alternate way of filtering with extended access-lists
>From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
>To: "John Matus" <john_matus@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ospf protocol number
>Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 14:26:49 -0400
>
>John,
>
> What I mean to say is that *since* they are two different
>protocol stacks their protocol numberings are unrelated. OSPFv2 and
>OSPFv3 share the same protocol number just for ease of remembering it.
>It's like RIPv2 using the multicast address 224.0.0.9 while RIPng uses
>FF02::9. While unrelated they are similar for the sake of making it
>easy to remember. Make sense?
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Matus [mailto:john_matus@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:19 PM
> > To: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: ospf protocol number
> >
> > if they are 2 different protocol stacks then i would think they would
>be 2
> > different protocol numbers.......
> > it's not an issue, i'm just an inquisitive fellow....
> >
> >
> > >From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
> > >To: "John Matus" <john_matus@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: RE: ospf protocol number
> > >Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:26:24 -0400
> > >
> > >John,
> > >
> > > They are different protocol stacks, why would this be an issue?
> > >
> > >
> > >Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > >bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> > >
> > >Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > >http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > >Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > >Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > >24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > >Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>Behalf
> > >Of
> > > > John Matus
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 6:03 PM
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: ospf protocol number
> > > >
> > > > ospf AND ospfv3 are protocol # 89??? i thought each on would be
> > > > different.
> > > > i don't konw why...hmmm. maybe i'm overthinking it.
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today -
>it's
> > >FREE!
> > > > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3