Re: Neighbor Statement on Both Sides

From: Jim (nhatquang@thiennam.org)
Date: Wed May 04 2005 - 02:32:20 GMT-3


I have never seen any trouble with putting neighbor on only one side in NBMA
nerwork, but on ISDN ( p2mp non-broadcast) with demain-circuit,
you will see trouble with ospf database if, for some reasons, the client (
no neighbor statement) loses it adj. Loop it up in the archive, Tim & Bob,
Brian used to in this topic.

----- Original Message -----
From: <gladston@br.ibm.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:32 AM
Subject: Neighbor Statement on Both Sides

> Hi,
>
> This Cisco Doc says it is good practice configuring neighbor statement on
> both sides.
>
> I though it was I good idea to configure it on just on side on the real
> lab, just to be sure they will not take out points because configuring it
> on just one side is enough.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> In fact I am reserching this topic because a scenario that worked fine
> until now is not going up today. It seems there is some problem on R2 (the
> hub with neighbor commands)
>
>
> ==========
> quoted
>
> Though configuring the neighbor statement on one end is sufficient to form
> adjacency, it is a good practice to have it configured on both the ends as
> shown.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/18.html
>
> ==========
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3