FRTS vs MQC

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Apr 29 2005 - 17:54:49 GMT-3

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Byte Limit on CB Shaping"
• Previous message: Bob: "IPSec and encrypted tunnels fair game?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,
 
With all that can be done with MQC considering the new 12.2T features, is
there still any feature in FRTS that can't be implemented using MQC?
 
Also, if a QoS task in the lab can be implemented correctly with either FRTS
or MQC, is one way less risky in terms of configuration errors?
 
I have a feeling that FRTS is probably a bit less risky because I don't have
to worry about subtle interactions that might be easily forgotten during the
lab.
 
What do you guys think?
 
TIA, Tim

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: Byte Limit on CB Shaping"
• Previous message: Bob: "IPSec and encrypted tunnels fair game?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:10 GMT-3