tunnels and mcast traffic

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Apr 22 2005 - 12:58:59 GMT-3

• Next message: Daniel Paes: "Re: precedence int cbwfq"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "interface command - ipv6 enable"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Guys,
 
I came across a scenario where an ipv6 IGP had to be selected to run over
isatap tunnels.
 
RIP v3 was ruled out because "tunnels" don't support multicast.
 
I'd like some clarification on the above statement.
 
Does that mean just ISATAP tunnels, just ipv6 tunnels or any type of tunnel?
 
I don't recall ever hearing that tunnels, in general, only forward unicast
traffic but I've learned not to trust my memory too much.
 
TIA, Tim

• Next message: Daniel Paes: "Re: precedence int cbwfq"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "interface command - ipv6 enable"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: tunnels and mcast traffic"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:07 GMT-3