From: mani poopal (mani_ccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 16 2005 - 15:43:33 GMT-3
Hi Brian and all,
The question gives set of custom queueing and asks us to conver to MQC.
=================================================
int e 0/1
custom-queue-list 1
queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 5000 limit 30
queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000
queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 500[we are taking byte count for queue 4/default as 1500]
queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp www
queue-list 2 protocol ip 2 tcp ftp
queue-list 2 protocol ip 2 tcp ftp-data
queue-list 3 protocol ip 3 tcp telnet
queue-list 4 default
=================================================
Solution in the guide:
ip cef
class-map TELNET
match protocol telnet
class-map FTP
match protocol FTP
class-map match-all WWW
match protocol HTTP
policy-map MIGRATION
class WWW
bandwidth percent 50
queue-limit 30
class FTP
bandwidth percent 30
class TELNET
bandwidth percent 5
interface eth 0/1
max-reserve-bandwidth 85
service-policy output MIGRATION
==========================
NOW for the question, the answer given in the solution guide is right because it changed the max reserve bandwidth to 85 and class-default takes remaining 15 percent bandwidht.
But What is the implication of defining bandwidth percent for class default
eg:
class class-default<---I know this accomplishes the same thing but is there is any difference
bandwidth percent 15
If we define a bandwidth percent for class class-default, do we have to leave the max-reserve bandwidth as 85 or changed to max-reserve-bandwidth 100. Any help is appreciated.
thanks
Mani
B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
(416)431 9929
MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:58 GMT-3