RE: policy routing woes (w/ correction)

From: John Matus (john_matus@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 16 2005 - 00:17:12 GMT-3


still denied.......here is the debug with the route-map policy PERMIT 20

02:20:54.115: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100, policy match
*Mar 1 02:20:54.115: IP: route map policy, item 20, permit
*Mar 1 02:20:54.115: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
policy rejected -- normal forwarding
*Mar 1 02:20:54.235: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
policy match
*Mar 1 02:20:54.235: IP: route map policy, item 20, permit
*Mar 1 02:20:54.235: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
policy rejected -- normal forwarding
*Mar 1 02:20:54.351: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
policy match
*Mar 1 02:20:54.351: IP: route map policy, item 20, permit

>From: "Ken Bartlinski" <kenbar3@gmail.com>
>To: "'John Matus'" <john_matus@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: policy routing woes (w/ correction)
>Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:10:18 -0400
>
>John,
>
>Try changing your statement from "route-map policy deny 20" to "route-map
>policy permit 20". I believe you are blocking a lot more than you intend to
>with this statement.
>
>Ken
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>John
>Matus
>Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:59 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: policy routing woes (w/ correction)
>
>ok......the topology.....
>
>R1----------------------R2-----------------------R3--------130.1.3.0
>---- ------
> ------ ---------R4-----------------
>
>
>R1 has 2 paths to R3, through R2 and R4. i'm using eigrp so the paths are
>equal cost at the moment. i decided to use policy routing to perfer the
>path thru R2 over R4 to get to the 130.1.3.0 subnet on r3.
>
>R1
>int s0/0
>no ip route-cache
>
>ip local policy route-map policy
>access-list 1 permit 130.1.3.0 0.0.0.255
>
>route-map policy permit 10
>match ip add 1
>set ip next-hop 150.1.124.2
>route-map policy deny 20
>
>
>
>my debug show that the policy routing fails but i have no idea WHY <cry>
>here is the debug:
>
>Mar 1 01:38:53.475: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy
>
>match
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.475: IP: route map policy, item 20, deny
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.475: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy rejected -- normal forwarding
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.595: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy match
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.595: IP: route map policy, item 20, deny
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.595: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy rejected -- normal forwarding
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.711: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy match
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.711: IP: route map policy, item 20, deny
>r1#
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.711: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy rejected -- normal forwarding
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.827: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy match
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.827: IP: route map policy, item 20, deny
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.827: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy rejected -- normal forwarding
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.943: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy match
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.943: IP: route map policy, item 20, deny
>*Mar 1 01:38:53.947: IP: s=130.1.124.1 (local), d=130.1.3.3, len 100,
>policy rejected -- normal f
>
>
>what am i doing wrong???????
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:58 GMT-3