From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 15 2005 - 12:48:08 GMT-3
You're right it does the same thing, but it's useful to know more than 1 way
of accomplishing the same thing.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Matrisciano [mailto:jmatrisciano@kenttech.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 4:14 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Building the Class-Map
Question to any QoS Gurus out there. While working in the various labs in
preparation for my (next) Lab attempt, I see different ways of building qos
policies to match on DSCP values and Precedence values. Below are two
separate class-maps that to me do the same thing. Would anyone disagree
with this and if so, why? I want to be able to produce a best practice
solution in the lab, however, I want to do it the quickest way possible. To
me, simple match commands in the class-map seem to work a lot quicker than
building an extended access list, then applying that list into the
class-map. Comments?
class-map match-all with_access_list
match access-group name qos
ip access-list extended qos
permit ip any any dscp 45
permit ip any any precedence network
class-map match-all qos
match ip precedence 7
match ip dscp 45
!
jm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:58 GMT-3