From: ccie Meftahi (samccie2004@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 09:45:45 GMT-3
Agreed, and that is precisely what I considered. One router doing both TDP and LDP on separate interfaces.
I guess it is time to LAB it and see.
Thank u all !
Sam
"McCallum, Robert" <robert.mccallum@thus.net> wrote:
fair point - whoops
Robert McCallum
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Radu Pavaloiu [mailto:Radu.Pavaloiu@connex.ro]
> Sent: 08 April 2005 13:10
> To: ccie Meftahi; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: MPLS on Juniper - Cisco
>
>
> Why you don't use LDP only on interfaces connected with
> Juniper routers? "(config-if)#mpls label protocol ldp"
>
> I die. I fracture into thousands of fragments of flushed
> embarrassment.
> My body parts fly, connectionless, over a badly constructed
> spanning tree that isn't quite loop free.
> I fall screaming into 127.0.0.1.
>
>
> Radu
> #2658
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of ccie Meftahi
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:25 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: O/T: MPLS on Juniper - Cisco
>
>
> Apologies for the O/T:
>
>
> I am planing to integrate Juniper to our existing Cisco
> network. My only concern is MPLS/VPN implementation. We are
> using TDP and reluctant to change the whole network to LDP.
>
> Has anyone been this path ?
>
> TIA
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:55 GMT-3