ip rtp header-compression/ip rsvp bandwidth/shape average vs

From: mani poopal (mani_ccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Apr 05 2005 - 09:47:42 GMT-3


Hi Group,
 
I have some questions about these 3 qos concetps. Any help/suggetion is appreciated.
 
In a frame Realy hub(physical) and spoke environment.R1 hub, R2,R3 spoke
****Q1 To allowcate voice calls x kbps and each call y kbps between HUB and one of the spoke(say between R1 and R3). we use -if)#ip rsvp bandwidth x y.
facts:
-Do have to give above command on the main interface and sub interfaces.
-If you enabled FRTS it disables fair queue, so in the map-class fair queue must be enabled
-Question:
(1.)Do we have to enable FRTS to configure ip rsvp bandwidth command
(2.) If we were not to configure FRTS, and enabled ip rsvp bandwidth between R1 and R3, doees the configuration at R1(Hub) affect R3 too.
 
 
****Q2 ip rtp header-compression
(1.)In a frame realy hub and spoke envirnment for a hub and specific spoke to enable rtp header compresss.
-Should it be enabled under main/sub interface or under frame-realy map statements.
-If FRTS is enabled, ip rtp header-compression should be configured on map-class or interface-dlci or interfaces
-Betweed two routers it is make sense to use passive keyword or only on one router.
 
 
***Q3
What is the difference between shape average xxx and police cir xxx, If a question asks to limted to average rate of x. What is correct and why.
 
thanks
 
Mani

B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
(416)431 9929
MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:53 GMT-3