From: Erick Bergquist (ebergquist@ameritech.net)
Date: Mon Apr 04 2005 - 02:30:34 GMT-3
I should have been more clear, I am adding a static
host route and it is getting put into EIGRP
automatically. I know static routes are frowned upon
in certain places but this isn't for that certain
place. Just general know-how and why.
Just trying to figure out why it is. Have searched and
looked at various cisco docs.
Thanks.
--- "Brant I. Stevens" <branto@branto.com> wrote:
> If you have an interface summary configured, a null0
> route is added. You
> don't have to worry about that as far as points are
> considered, so long as
> YOU aren't the one typing 'ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
> NULL0'
>
> HTH,
> Brant
>
>
> On 04/03/2005 11:33 PM, "Erick Bergquist"
> <ebergquist@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone have a idea why a static route for a host
> > address to null0 gets automatically redistributed
> into
> > EIGRP? I have no redist static under the router
> eigrp
> > process and have tried distribute-list and the
> route
> > still shows in the eigrp topology table on the
> same
> > router.
> >
> > Any way to kill this behavior?
> >
> > Thanks, Erick
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:52 GMT-3