From: Dillon Yang (gzdillon@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 29 2005 - 12:27:51 GMT-3
Hi,
I agree too. But, how about this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008010a39a.html#wp1042007,
<quote>
Usage Guidelines
This command permits the point-to-point (nonbroadcast) exchange of routing information. When used in combination with the passive-interface router configuration command, routing information can be exchanged between a subset of routers and access servers on a LAN.
</quote>
best regards
dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "'Dillon Yang'" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>; "'mani poopal'" <mani_ccie@yahoo.com>
Cc: "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: no sending eigrp update
> Dillon,
>
> The passive command is very funky. It works in different ways depending on
> the IGP.
>
> With eigrp:
>
> It stops hello packets so no adjacency can be formed with any neighbors out
> that interface. The neighbor command doesn't override this behavior. (So,
> even if unicast update packets were sent by using the neighbor (and I don't
> know if they are), it wouldn't matter because there won't be any adjacency.)
>
> With rip:
>
> It stops broadcast and multicast updates but doesn't stop unicast updates.
> So, to send only unicast updates use both the passive and neighbor command.
>
> With ISIS:
>
> It injects the ip addr of that interface into the isis routing process but
> also stops adjacencies out the specified interface.
>
> HTH, Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Dillon Yang
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:10 AM
> To: mani poopal
> Cc: Group Study
> Subject: Re: no sending eigrp update
>
> Hi, mani:
>
> I remember scott said that " passive" and " neighbor" are mutually bad for
> neighborhood, but are they also, "passive" and "network"?
>
> TIA
> dillon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mani poopal" <mani_ccie@yahoo.com>
> To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>; "Group Study"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:45 PM
> Subject: Re: no sending eigrp update
>
>
> > Hi Dillon,
> >
> > In eigrp, you cannot use passive interface command, this command will
> prevent adjacency formation with the neighbor. Only 2 solutions exists
> > 1.distribute-list 101 out s 0
> > access-list 101 deny ip any any
> >
> > 2.eigrp stub receive-only
> >
> > Mani
> >
> > Dillon Yang <gzdillon@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, group:
> >
> > At 911network, a Task: not to send eigrp updates from your pod (Rx) to the
> backbone but you must be able to recieve routes from the bb:
> >
> > router eigrp 10
> > distribute-list 10 out e0/0
> > access-list 10 deny any
> >
> > I think the following config is ok, too:
> >
> > router eigrp 10
> > passsive default
> > network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> >
> > Any advice?
> >
> > TIA
> > dillon
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
> > (416)431 9929
> > MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:54 GMT-3