From: Lee Donald (Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 24 2005 - 06:05:51 GMT-3
They should still be either a /32 or /24, depending on how you brought them
into OSPF. Except for a multipoint network, /32 host routes are generated by
default.
Lee.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dillon Yang [mailto:gzdillon@hotmail.com]
Sent: 24 March 2005 08:54
To: Lee Donald
Cc: Group Study
Subject: /32 addr. dillon Re: Adding Loopbacks into the OSPF Process
Hi, Lee:
Thanks for reply.
And, how do you handle the /32 address in a FR ospf backbone? Have you
met the situation?
I set command "area range", but this just affected the NON-backbone area,
the /32 addresses were still in the RIB of ABRs. So, if one is asked to do
optimal addressing, how about the /32 addresses?
TIA
dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Donald" <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>
To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>; "Lee Donald"
<Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>
Cc: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: Adding Loopbacks into the OSPF Process
> Hi Dillion,
>
> They both work but the match interface puts it into the OSPF process as a
> /32, whereas the route-map and access-list puts it in with a /24, which
> meets the requirement of my question.
>
> I don't know why ??
>
> Regards
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dillon Yang [mailto:gzdillon@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2005 00:56
> To: Lee Donald
> Cc: Group Study
> Subject: Re: Adding Loopbacks into the OSPF Process
>
> Hi, Lee:
>
> The combination of "match interface " and "redis conn" do works.
> But I dont know why the "match interface" can be used for source of
> redistribution, you know, the command is a policy routing command that
show
> a destination direction to a certain interface.
>
> Any advice?
>
> TIA
> dillon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lee Donald" <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>
> To: "'Danshtr'" <danshtr@gmail.com>; "Lee Donald"
> <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>; "'Cisco certification'"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Adding Loopbacks into the OSPF Process
>
>
> > I have figured it out thanks Dan.
> > If you use " match interface Loopback1" , under the route-map it keeps
it
> as
> > a /32.
> > If you use an access-list it puts it in as a /24.
> >
> > Thanks for your help guys.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What is the rest of it Dan ?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Danshtr [mailto:danshtr@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 22 March 2005 13:58
> > To: Lee Donald
> > Subject: Re: Adding Loopbacks into the OSPF Process
> >
> > reditribute connected route-map only_24
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:54:49 -0000, Lee Donald
> > <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk> wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Does anybody know how to add a loopback into the OSPF process as a /24
> > > without changing the network type ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Lee.
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:51 GMT-3