From: Noble (noble@inserviceindia.com)
Date: Sun Mar 20 2005 - 12:28:46 GMT-3
I have seen a similar kind of problem and the reason was that the VLANs
(firewall VLANs) were not equally applied to the FWSM. What I mean exactly
is that there were 4 VLANs (including the failover one) in one box applied
to FWSM and in the other one there were only 3 VLANs applied.
I have Cat OS in Switch and IOS in MSFC.
BTW, what is the status of sh fail? Is it ok?
Thanks,
Noble
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Danshtr
Sent: 20 March 2005 10:18
To: Richard Anderson
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: FWSM
No problem here.
maybe your failover is not configured the right way.
Make sure the "failover interface" is configured correctly on both FWSM and
there is connection between the vlans on both 6509.
Good luck ...
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:00:28 -0800, Richard Anderson
<richard.p.anderson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Does anyone know if FWSMs have a problem running a redundatnt mode. I
> have
> (2) 6509 WAN router running FWSMs, but routing fails between the
> campuses if both the 6509 are up at the same time. It only happened
> after we enabled FWSMs that is cauing lot of problems. If we bring
> one 6509 down then routing works fine.
>
> 2) After enabling FWSM, we can't even telnet not to the 6509, because
> telnet is not allowed. Is there any work around.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Best regards, Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:48 GMT-3