Re: Re: MQC vs Policy Routing

From: trouse@cisco.com
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 01:38:46 GMT-3

Next message: ccie zeng: "How to filter DLSW+ traffic"
Previous message: kaiseranwar@sbcglobal.net: "Test"
Maybe in reply to: Sumit: "Re: MQC vs Policy Routing"
Next in thread: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: Re: MQC vs Policy Routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

That is a good one to remember: match ip next-hop

However, I am not sure you really need the default next-hop portion. When will it ever be used. you would aways route based on "set next-hop" and a "set default next-hop" would only apply when you are looking through the routing table and do not find a route. Correct?

Next message: ccie zeng: "How to filter DLSW+ traffic"
Previous message: kaiseranwar@sbcglobal.net: "Test"
Maybe in reply to: Sumit: "Re: MQC vs Policy Routing"
Next in thread: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: Re: MQC vs Policy Routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:47 GMT-3