From: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 01:18:14 GMT-3
Since you have Juniper, you don't have to worry about the router process
choke.
Maybe, you can build MPLS over 5 E1 interface. Instead of loadbalance, you
can make MPLS choose one link out of 5 E1. But in case of failure of primary
link, you can make MPLS to fast-reroute to next E1. And you can statically
route the type of traffic to go through this MPLS and you can apply policing
with 1 Mbps rate limit.
I believe most Juniper support MPLS.
This is just my theoretical thought.
Jongsoo
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Stoddard [mailto:scott@gblx.net]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Anyway to police a traffic type across multiple session based
load-balanced interfaces with an aggregated value?
Hi all, anyone know if its possible to police a type of traffic
across multiple load-balanced interfaces? For example I have 5 E1's that are
session based load-balanced that I want to police a type of traffic. This
type of traffic should not exceed the aggregated value of 1meg for marked
traffic across all interfaces. I sure that can be solved with making a
virtual interface like a GRE tunnel or a MLPPP bundle, but in this case the
other side is a Juniper that would require a new PIC to support either of
these options :-). Thanks.
--Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:47 GMT-3