From: Sundar Palaniappan (sundarp@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 23:38:45 GMT-3
Matt,
On R2, don't you need CLNS map statments since you are using
multipoint int. I believe, you need map statements for CLNS unless you
are using p-t-p int.
--Sundar Palaniappan
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:09:42 -0500, Matt Mullen <mullenm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all, i'm working on a lab scenario where R2 is the hub with a
> multipoint f/r subinterface. R4 and R6 are the spokes and are using
> the physical interface. R4 and R6 should from an adjacency with R2,
> but R2 is getting an encapsulation failure when sending the hello
> packets on interface s0.246. Here's the configs and relevant debug
> output:
>
> R2:
>
> interface Serial0.246 multipoint
> ip address 138.10.100.2 255.255.255.224
> ip router isis
> frame-relay interface-dlci 104
> frame-relay interface-dlci 106
> end
>
> router isis
> net 49.0024.0000.0000.0002.00
>
> sh debug
> CLNS:
> IS-IS Adjacency related packets debugging is on
> R2#
> 02:10:33: ISIS-Adj: Encapsulation failed for L1 LAN IIH on Serial0.246
>
> R2#sh clns ne
>
> System Id Interface SNPA State Holdtime Type Protocol
> 0000.0000.0006 Se0.246 DLCI 106 Init 27 L1L2 IS-IS
> 0000.0000.0004 Se0.246 DLCI 104 Init 28 L1 IS-IS
>
> R4:
>
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 138.10.100.4 255.255.255.224
> ip router isis
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay map clns 401 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.10.100.2 401 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.10.100.6 401 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>
> router isis
> net 49.0024.0000.0000.0004.00
> is-type level-1
>
> R6:
>
> R6#show run int s0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 343 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 138.10.100.6 255.255.255.224
> ip router isis
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay map clns 601 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.10.100.2 601 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.10.100.4 601 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.10.100.6 601 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> end
>
> router isis
> net 49.0024.0000.0000.0006.00
>
> R4 and R6 do not see R2 as a neighbor at all, while R2 sees both R4
> and R6 but shows them both in an Init state. Can anyone point out
> what might be going on here?
>
> TIA,
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:46 GMT-3