From: Dillon Yang (gzdillon@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 09 2005 - 12:48:33 GMT-3
Hi, Jc
Sorry, I forgot some part config.
!
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 73 metric 100 100 255 1 1500
network 3.3.56.5 0.0.0.0
network 3.3.65.5 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
!
router ospf 73
log-adjacency-changes
area 112 virtual-link 3.3.3.3
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 2000 subnets
network 3.3.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
network 3.3.35.5 0.0.0.0 area 112
network 3.3.125.5 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
neighbor 3.3.125.1
neighbor 3.3.125.2
neighbor 3.3.35.3 priority 133
I do know classfull and classless, but as you see, the config is "router ospf".
This is what I want to distinguish.
TIA
dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: "JC" <jc@gigavelocity.com>
To: "'Dillon Yang'" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 11:34 PM
Subject: RE: *** Spam *** Ospf-->Eigrp
> Dillon,
>
> Because EIGRP is a classless routing protocol it will not automatically
> redistribute the connected interfaces where the classfull routing
> protocols like RIP will (if they are within the same major net).
>
> You should try redistribution testing between various different
> protocols to see how it works. This is very important to understand!
>
> Regards,
>
> JC
> GigaVelocity
>
> Cisco CCIE Rack Rentals
> Internework Expert Premier Reseller
>
> Visit us: www.gigavelocity.com
> Email us: sales@gigavelocity.com
> Phone us: 630.921.0420
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dillon Yang [mailto:gzdillon@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:10 AM
> To: jc@gigavelocity.com
> Cc: Group Study
> Subject: *** Spam *** Ospf-->Eigrp
>
> Hi,Jc:
>
>
> I have another problem:
> Why not have the connected addresses been redistributed into EIGRP?
> !
> router ospf 73
> log-adjacency-changes
> area 112 virtual-link 3.3.3.3
> redistribute eigrp 100 metric 2000 subnets
> network 3.3.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
> network 3.3.35.5 0.0.0.0 area 112
> network 3.3.125.5 0.0.0.0 area 0.0.0.0
> neighbor 3.3.125.2
> neighbor 3.3.125.1
> neighbor 3.3.35.3 priority 133
> !
> r5>s ip ei to 3.3.125.0
> % IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Route not in topology table
> r5>s ip ei to 3.3.35.0
> % IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Route not in topology table
> r5>s ip ei to 3.3.5.0
> % IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Route not in topology table
>
> TIA
> dillon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JC" <jc@gigavelocity.com>
> To: "'Dillon Yang'" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:41 PM
> Subject: RE: *** Spam *** Re: eigrp neighbor command
>
>
> > Dillon,
> >
> > The problem with passive and eigrp is that passive blocks the hello
> > packets for neighbor adjacency. RIP doesn't have this requirement
> > therefore the passive/neighbor functionality works without problem.
> You
> > can better view these differences by looking at a debug or sniffer
> > capture.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > JC
> > GigaVelocity
> > www.gigavelocity.com
> > Rack rentals and Internetwork Expert Premier Reseller
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:43 GMT-3