From: simon hart (simon.hart@btinternet.com)
Date: Mon Mar 07 2005 - 15:44:20 GMT-3
Hi,
I believe promiscuous will support tcp, fst and dlswlite. I think it may
prove troublesome for direct encapsulation
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: 07 March 2005 17:24
To: Group Study
Subject: dlsw promiscuous and encap type
Hi guys,
If one peer is configured like this:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 promiscuous
can the other peer use any type of encap, tcp, fst, direct, dlsw lite as
appropriate?
Or, does using promiscuous on one side restrict the type of encap that can
be used on the remote side?
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:42 GMT-3