RE: Redistribution in 3 protocols

From: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com
Date: Sat Mar 05 2005 - 13:43:37 GMT-3


Yang

I believe Route-map has an explicit deny when it is applied to redistribute
while it has the opposite effect when applied to policy-routing.

 
route-map conn2ospf permit 10
  match ip address prefix-list conn28
  set metric 2000

route-map conn2ospf permit 20 ===> you need to this statement to permit all
other routes.

Regards

Jongsoo

-----Original Message-----
From: Dillon Yang [mailto:gzdillon@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:27 AM
To: Kim, Jongsoo
Cc: Group Study
Subject: Re: Redistribution in 3 protocols

Jongsoo:

 I do not prohibit the route, the ACL is for distance.

regards
dillon

############################################################

Building on 40 Years of Leadership - As a global communications leader with 40 years of experience, Intelsat helps service providers,
broadcasters, corporations and governments deliver information and entertainment anywhere in the world, instantly, securely and reliably.

############################################################
This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
destroy all copies of the original message. Any views
expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them
to be the views of Intelsat, Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
############################################################



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:41 GMT-3