ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols

From: Matt White (mwhite23@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 04 2005 - 17:40:49 GMT-3

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: OSPF summary and multiple ABRs due VL"
• Previous message: marvin greenlee: "RE: OSPF summary and multiple ABRs due VL"
• Next in thread: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Matt White: "Re: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Matt White: "Re: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Let's say I have encapsulation frame-relay on a physical serial
interface, ip split-horizon becomes automatically disabled. If I
assign an IP address and apply this to an OSPF process, would it be
considered best practice to re-enable split-horizon?

I understand the split-horizon has nothing to do with a link state
protocol like OSPF, but would this hurt/help in any specific
situations?

I believe it IS considered best-practice to do this on a stub RIP
frame-relay physical interface, correct?

Thanks for you help guys.

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: OSPF summary and multiple ABRs due VL"
• Previous message: marvin greenlee: "RE: OSPF summary and multiple ABRs due VL"
• Next in thread: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Matt White: "Re: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Matt White: "Re: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Maybe reply: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:40 GMT-3