From: NGUYEN Trung (trung@vnsystem.net)
Date: Fri Mar 04 2005 - 15:56:57 GMT-3
totally agree,
i did this one time and after doing clear ip route, it works.
Trung.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "'Dillon Yang'" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>; "'Group Study'"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: Redistribution in 3 protocols
> Dillon,
>
> GS people could help you better if you posted your config's and the output
> of some show ip route commands.
>
> But, in general, it's a good idea to clear your ip route tables after
> making
> routing configuration changes. Sometimes, that clears up an apparent
> problem.
>
> HTH, Tim
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Dillon Yang
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:43 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Redistribution in 3 protocols
>
> Hi, dear all:
>
>
> I'm confused by this topology:
>
> |ospf----------(s0/1)R3(s0/2)-----------isis-
> | | ospf |
> | | |
> | |------eigrp------R1(s0/2)---------isis| |
> | | | |
> (1)(2) (s0/1)(s0/2)
> R2(3)-----eigrp-----------------------(s0/1)R4------150.100.2.3-------Ethern
> et
>
>
> Though I shutdown the e0 of R4, the address 150.100.2.0/24 is still seen
> in
> the 3 protocol.
> I can not prevent routing loop in the case by using "distance xxx
> address/mask <acl>".
> Any advice?
>
> dillon
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:40 GMT-3