From: Dennis J. Hartmann (dennisjhartmann@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 19:58:59 GMT-3
Here's the SPD explanation:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/routers/ps167/products_tech_n
ote09186a008012fb87.shtml
-Dennis Hartmann
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Meyer
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Brian McGahan
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Tom Young; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: LLQ for eigrp
Brian,
From my understanding OSPF does not land in the default queue when doing
CBWFQ nor does it get bundled with the L2 traffic partitioned by the
max-reserve.
Is there a way to verify where the pak-priority labeled traffic is going as
it leaves the router ?
Regards,
Dave
______________________________________________
Architecture & Engineering
Work: (201) 593-5545
Cell: (973) 907-4963
"Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> Sent by:
nobody@groupstudy.com
03/01/2005 11:27 AM
Please respond to "Brian McGahan"
To: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>,
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: LLQ for eigrp
Tom,
The router has an internal mechanism to do this already.
It is
an internal tag called "pak_priority". RIP, OSPF, and IS-IS packets
generated by the router are tagged pak_priority, and I would assume EIGRP is
as well.
For more information see:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/rtgupdates.html
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Tom Young
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:58 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: LLQ for eigrp
>
> Hi, group
>
> I heard the LLQ configuration is work well for voice packet, not work
> well for application traffic. Because almost all of applications
> traffic has the brast character . Does it right ?
> I want to use the LLQ for eigrp packet between HQ and remote office,
> because the traffic is large between them, I worry about the date
> transfer will effect on the eigrp so that the network topology
> couldn't keep stability. How about your suggestion?
>
> thanks alot
>
> __________________________________
> Let's Celebrate Together!
> Yahoo! JAPAN
> http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:39 GMT-3