From: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 12:59:22 GMT-3
Scott
Thanks for your input and I certainly see your point but the subject topic I
mentioned below covers very unique area.
At least, I don't believe it was the case of point influenced by other
topics.
All
I think I am going to mention this to Cisco officially as there may be some
room for Cisco ccie lab team to improve.
Regards
Jongsoo
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 02 March, 2005 8:49 AM
To: 'PhiL'; 'Keane, James'
Cc: Kim, Jongsoo; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Some frustration my attempt on yesterday 28- Feb
I don't believe that's correct. It makes much more sense that it's out of
point values. However, with the subject lines as vague as they are on the
score report, it is more plausible that there were other point values
considered part of that section and thus the breakout was different than 2 +
3.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of PhiL
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:09 AM
To: Keane, James
Cc: Jongsoo.Kim@intelsat.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Some frustration my attempt on yesterday 28- Feb
Jongsoo,
The percentage the score gives you is based on number of questions anwered
correclty for each topic, and not based on points. If you have
2 questions in the same topic as you did no matter how many points each, you
will get a 50% if you answer only one correct.
PhiL
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:42:48 -0000, Keane, James
<James.Keane@agriculture.gov.ie> wrote:
> Wrong IOS,
> That is most unfortunate, i think you have a claim to get exam money
> refunded, I dont think that is fair, as you cant know which image is
> required without CCO access AND CCO access is NOT a requirement of the
lab.
>
> I think you have a case, see if they will let you resit for free.
>
> Worth a shot
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com [mailto:Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com]
> Sent: 02 March 2005 04:23
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Some frustration my attempt on yesterday 28- Feb
>
> At least, a couple of things went wrong. I like to share my
> frustarion with some of you without violating NDA, maybe it help you a
> little on what to expect.
>
> On a topic, there were two questions( 2 point and 3 point) and I had
> to skip one 2 point question and I answered one 3 point question. So
> if I had failed the lab, I expected I would see 60% or 0% of grade on
> that topic. I remember this clearly because I was happy it was only 2
> point question not the 3 point question that I had to skip.
> And I failed the lab but I saw 50%, which is not possible in my
> elementary school algebra. One of explanation in my mind is maybe a
> wrong script was used to grade my lab. But I decided not to challenge
> cisco by spending $250 like I did on my previous attempt. Most likely
> I would be a loser if I can't pass 80. I at least mention this on my
> feedback survey. Please let me know if anyone have the similar case,
> then I like to mention cisco about that officially.
>
> The other frustration I had was that I had to ask Protoc to upgrade
> IOS on a router not supporting IPv6 while I am doing a lab around noon
> when my brain started dying on me. Also, I can't be the first person
> who used that particular rack( low number of rack) configuring IPv6
> exam that has been out two months ago. It is possible that some people
> may be "ripped off" by poor preparation of ccie lab. Who can even expect
to have a wrong IOS on exam...
>
> Regards
>
> Jongsoo
>
> ############################################################
>
> Building on 40 Years of Leadership - As a global communications leader
> with 40 years of experience, Intelsat helps service providers,
broadcasters, corporations and governments deliver information and
entertainment anywhere in the world, instantly, securely and reliably.
>
> ############################################################
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
> views of Intelsat, Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
> ############################################################
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> **********************************************************************
> *********** Department of Agriculture and Food ***************
>
> The information contained in this email and in any attachments is
> confidential and is designated solely for the attention and use of the
> intended recipient(s).
> This information may be subject to legal and professional privilege.
> If you are not an intended recipient of this email, you must not use,
> disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message or any part of it.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete all copies of this email from your computer
> system(s).
> **********************************************************************
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Regards,PhiL
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:38 GMT-3