From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 13:27:38 GMT-3
Tom,
The router has an internal mechanism to do this already. It is
an internal tag called "pak_priority". RIP, OSPF, and IS-IS packets
generated by the router are tagged pak_priority, and I would assume
EIGRP is as well.
For more information see:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/rtgupdates.html
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Tom Young
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:58 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: LLQ for eigrp
>
> Hi, group
>
> I heard the LLQ configuration is work well for voice
> packet, not work well for application traffic. Because
> almost all of applications traffic has the brast character
> . Does it right ?
> I want to use the LLQ for eigrp packet between HQ and
> remote office, because the traffic is large between them,
> I worry about the date transfer will effect on the eigrp
> so that the network topology couldn't keep stability. How
> about your suggestion?
>
> thanks alot
>
> __________________________________
> Let's Celebrate Together!
> Yahoo! JAPAN
> http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:38 GMT-3