From: Balaji Siva (bsivasub@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 26 2005 - 01:04:36 GMT-3
Alright my bad... It is not the case (I remember it being the case in
CatOS but I know it is not the same).
You are correct, use the switchport trunk native-vlan command
Regards
Balaji
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:18:44 +0200, Danshtr <danshtr@gmail.com> wrote:
> isnt "switchport trunk native-vlan"
> is the command to set the native vlan?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/55m6t
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:08:28 -0500, Balaji Siva <bsivasub@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It would be native vlan of the trunk port (in the case dot1q) . so it
> > is relevant.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Balaji
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:34:44 -0500, gladston@br.ibm.com
> > <gladston@br.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > No, it is not necessary. It could be the case someone configured the port as access in the past, and now the port is configured as trunk. It does not help or hurt.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dan
>
> <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=1">Get
> Firefox!</a>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:25 GMT-3