BGP Confederation

From: k c (jwongccie@yahoo.com.hk)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2005 - 06:23:19 GMT-3

• Next message: k c: "Extended Access List"
• Previous message: Balaji Siva: "Re: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Next in thread: k c: "Re: BGP Confederation"
• Maybe reply: k c: "Re: BGP Confederation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,
 
Here is the test scenario:
 
BB2(AS2) - R4 (AS65012) - R2 (AS65011) - R5 (AS65011) - R6 (AS65013) - BB1(AS2)
R4,R2,R5&R6 belongs to AS1
I would like to confirm whether
- Should R4 include AS65013 (R4 has bgp connection to R2, not R6) in " bgp confederation peers" command?
- Should R2 include AS65013 (no bgp connection between R2 and R6)?
- Should R6 include AS65012?
 
From Cisco BGP Case Study, the answer is yes. But in CCBootCamp answer, the ans is No. Which one should be correct?
 
Thanks.

---------------------------------
7s&~D@1f2D$@&l : 'd(l$M=t$H

• Next message: k c: "Extended Access List"
• Previous message: Balaji Siva: "Re: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Next in thread: k c: "Re: BGP Confederation"
• Maybe reply: k c: "Re: BGP Confederation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:20 GMT-3