From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Feb 11 2005 - 12:33:30 GMT-3
Thanks Amran,
Therefore, based on that link and your comments below, generally, the
following is true:
Features in 12.0 (x) S will end up in mainline 12.1 but not normally in a
12.0 (x)T train, correct?
And, features in 12.2 (x) S will end up in mainline 12.3 but usually
wouldn't be in 12.2T, true?
Thanks for bearing with me.
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ahmed, Amran" <Amran.Ahmed@let-it-be-thus.com>
To: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>;
"'McNeace, Roger'" <RMcNeace@ciena.com>; "'Group Study'"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: IOS version confusion
> Hi
>
> Generally speaking the features from a T,S,F etc train will end up in the
> next main line train. ie 12.1T and 12.1S end up in 12.2 main line, however
> there are excetions to the rule, (ie release of a S train in 12.1 after
12.2
> main line has been released, in which case the features of 12.1S will be
> included in 12.2(x)).
>
> You really need to follow the road map for each IOS to be sure, check out
> following URL for migration details
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/roadmap.shtml
>
> You need CCO for above.
>
> -A
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: 11 February 2005 15:04
> To: groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com; 'McNeace, Roger'; 'Group Study'
> Subject: Re: IOS version confusion
>
>
> Hi Tony, Roger,
>
> I've read that document a number of times but it doesn't say what happens
to
> S train releases and if features that are included in S trains are
included
> in later T trains.
>
> For example, will features first supported in 12.0(26) S or 12.2(25)S
also
> be included in 12.2T ?
>
> Thanks, Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Schaffran" <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
> To: "'McNeace, Roger'" <RMcNeace@ciena.com>; "'ccie2be'"
> <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "'Group Study'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:40 AM
> Subject: RE: IOS version confusion
>
>
> That is the best link I have seen to explain all of this.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> McNeace, Roger
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:34 AM
> To: 'ccie2be'; Group Study
> Subject: RE: IOS version confusion
>
>
> Check out link on IOS trains, this should help you determine what is
> included in specific versions of IOS.
>
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1828/products_white_paper0
> 9186a008018305e.shtml
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:24 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: IOS version confusion
>
> Hi guys,
>
> As you all know, we ccie candidates are responsible for any and all
features
> in IOS 12.2 T.
>
> Now, let's say that as we go through the Doc-CD and see a certain feature
is
> available as of these IOS releases:
>
>
> 12.0(26)S, 12.2(18) S, 12.3(2)T
>
> would such a feature be fair game for the lab based on 12.2 T ?
>
> IOW, do features that first appeared in an S train of IOS get incorporated
> into the T train of later releases?
>
> A number of times, I've tried to actually figure out how this IOS naming
> really works, but each time I think I understand it, I later discover my
> logic doesn't apply.
>
> TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3