From: Richard Dumoulin (Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 17:21:51 GMT-3
Then you are missing the Cisco scenario based doc on the Web!
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy [mailto:AndyMrozek@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:56 PM
To: 'Brian Dennis'; 'ccie2be'; 'Group Study'
Subject: RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation
I can REHAT LINUX by far .... Very detailed , scenario based easy to read
docs... I look for scenario based examples , not just a command option1
option2 type thing , when you look at cisco command ref the guideline
section is very brief , some of them are fine but others leave you wondering
...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian Dennis
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:50 AM
To: ccie2be; Group Study
Subject: RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation
Tim,
Can you give an example of another vendor that puts out a better
documentation CD?
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:34 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: Quality of Cisco Documentation
Hi guys,
I'm just wondering how many people think like I do that Cisco
Documentation is
extremely poor
especially what's included on the Doc-CD?
Aside from complaining about how terrible it is, do you think there's
anything
that can be done that would make Cisco vastly improve the quality of
it's
documentation?
Personally, I think Cisco should demand the same level of quality from
it's
documentation as it does for potential ccie's.
Can you imagine how good the documentation would be if the quality of
the
documentation had to be as high as the skills
needed to pass the ccie lab?
What's your opinion?
Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3