From: Edwin Wargo (edwin@rsquared.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:20:35 GMT-3
Cisco's documentation CD and CCO are the gold standard in
my opinion. I am currently working on an
architectural/engineering project that involves Cisco,
Juniper, and SonicWall. Cisco's documentation is by far
much more thorough and detailed especially in comparison
to SonicWall's documentation.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:50:12 -0500
"Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> Tim,
> Can you give an example of another vendor that puts out
>a better
> documentation CD?
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com
>[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:34 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Quality of Cisco Documentation
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just wondering how many people think like I do that
>Cisco
> Documentation is
> extremely poor
>
> especially what's included on the Doc-CD?
>
> Aside from complaining about how terrible it is, do you
>think there's
> anything
> that can be done that would make Cisco vastly improve
>the quality of
> it's
>
> documentation?
>
>
> Personally, I think Cisco should demand the same level
>of quality from
> it's
> documentation as it does for potential ccie's.
>
> Can you imagine how good the documentation would be if
>the quality of
> the
> documentation had to be as high as the skills
>
> needed to pass the ccie lab?
>
> What's your opinion?
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
This email was scanned for viruses by RAV AntiVirus.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3