From: Jonathan ZD (Nuvo25@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:03:49 GMT-3
I'm totally agree with you on the part about how poor Cisco Docs are
written. So many mistakes and so vague.
The "addres-family ipv6" command can be used for both ISIS and BGP. There
should not be option "multicast" for ISIS. This option is ued for MBGP for
RPF purpose when routing multicast traffic between AS.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:46 AM
Subject: ipv6 ISIS - address-family ipv6 [unicast | multicast] - English
translation needed
> Hi guys,
>
> Does anybody understand when and why I would need to use the unicast or
> multicast options in the above command?
>
> I checked the command reference and found it to be useless.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/ipv6_
> r/ipv6_01g.htm#wp1818513
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity, I wonder how many other people are there that consider
the
> Cisco documentation extremely poorly written?
>
> To me, it seems inappropriate that Cisco makes the standard for passing
the
> lab and getting a ccie so HIGH while it's standard for
>
> it's own documentation is so LOW.
>
> I know my ranting won't do any good, but it's just a reflection of my
> frustration with the crappy documentation.
>
> TIA, Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:18 GMT-3