From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2005 - 15:33:24 GMT-3
Try using dialer rotary-group as mentioned.
R4(config)#int br0/0
R4(config-if)#dialer rotary-group 2
R4(config-if)#int dialer 2
R4(config-if)#dialer in-band
R4(config-if)#dialer map ip 10.45.45.5 5272025
R4(config-if)#do sho run int dialer 2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 90 bytes
!
interface Dialer2
no ip address
dialer in-band
dialer map ip 10.45.45.5 5272025
end
R4(config-if)#
The dialer interface is tied to the BRI by the rotary group number (i.e.
if you use rotary group 1, then create dialer interface 1)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:32 AM
To: Keane, James
Cc: Group Study
Subject: Re: int dialer without dialer string
james,
You're right.
I just tried using int dialer 0
and this is what happened:
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer map ip 157.1.45.4 broad 5272014
%Configure a "dialer in-band", or "dialer pool" first.
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer po 1
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer map ip 157.1.45.4 broad 5272014
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer m?
max-call
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer m
So, using int dialer 0, in fact, isn't an option - at least in the way
shown
above.
Interesting.
Thanks, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keane, James" <James.Keane@agriculture.gov.ie>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: int dialer without dialer string
wwwwait a minute
the reason you dont get it under dailer 1 is because you have a dialer
pool
configured
I bet dialer 0 hasnt been configured yet
Give the rotary group a go- you WILL need to know all 3 ISDN options for
the
lab
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: 03 February 2005 15:16
To: loc.pham@comcast.net; Group Study
Subject: Re: int dialer without dialer string
Geez
Rack1R5(config)#int dialer 1
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer map ?
% Unrecognized command
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer map
So, dialer map can't be used under int dialer 1,
but, under int dialer 0
Rack1R5(config-if)#int di 0
Rack1R5(config-if)#dialer m?
map mult-map-same-name
This is amazing. What an eye opener.
Thanks, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: <loc.pham@comcast.net>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: int dialer without dialer string
> Dialer map can also be use under int dialer0.
> lP.
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > In this task, I'm suppose to configure an isdn connection using
dialer
> > interfaces, but I'm not allowed to use
> >
> > the dialer string command.
> >
> > I'm clueless on this.
> >
> > I can't use a dialer map command on a dialer interface, so how can
L3 to
L2
> > resolution be done.
> >
> > Anybody have any ideas?
> >
> > TIA, Tim
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:17 GMT-3