From: Conte, Charles (Charles.Conte@nasdaq.com)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2005 - 21:29:13 GMT-3
Hello,
If MSFC's are available at the access-layer, can anybody
tell me why we wouldn't run L3 to the access layer if the primary and
secondary access switches are available in convenient locations? Also
for the attached gifs can anybody provide any opinions on why one
wouldn't extend L3 to the access instead of having L2 only Access
switches [Example 1 L3] V.S. [Example 2 L2]? I like avoiding L2 in any
situations that I can. I can understand if the requirement is to have
the vlan available at every switch to go with example 2, but if not it
wouldn't make sense to extend L2 everywhere. Any opinions appreciated!
Thanks!
Charles
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of example_gif_2.gif]
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of example_gif_1.gif]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:27 GMT-3