From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Sun Jan 30 2005 - 22:05:28 GMT-3
Hi there. We applyed it on HSSI interface. FlexWan module of 6509. It
works very well.
Cordially,
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaerte
Balaji Siva <bsivasub@gmail.com>
30/01/2005 02:19
Please respond to
Balaji Siva
To
Alaerte Gladston Vidali/Brazil/IBM@IBMBR
cc
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject
Re: Re: CBWFQ resources
Your class name has a typo ..that is why it didn't work ;)
just kidding
Anyway, were you using this LLQ on a WAN interface. LLQ interface is
not supported on 6500 for LAN interfaces AFAIK as it uses hw
forwarding not IOS forwarding. There is hw queue on the interface to
prioritize the traffic.
Thanks
Balaji
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:01:27 -0500, gladston@br.ibm.com
<gladston@br.ibm.com> wrote:
> Well, free I don't know.
> Payed, I found DQoS by Wendell and Catalyst Qos by Flannagan very good.
>
> During work days, I found some problems not documented on Cisco DOC
about CBWQF. The last one, there is a bug that make it do not work with
named access-list. I just discover it after openning a case on TAC (in
fact, it was necessary more than one time, until a guy from Cisco that was
aware of the problem help me).
>
> The problem occurred with these configuration. If using named
access-list, no traffic is matched.
>
> class-map match-all Multimidia
> match access-group 161
> !
> policy-map mbi
> class Multimidia
> priority 200
> class class-default
> random-detect
> fair-queue
>
> It was a 6509, with IOS 12.1(22)E.
> The police is applyed outbound.
>
> Good Luck.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:27 GMT-3