From: Joe Smith (j333smith@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 28 2005 - 11:54:39 GMT-3
R8 doesn't have the neighbor peer route, as can be seen in its routing
table. Need to make sure that PPP is negotiated again to install the
neighbor peer route as connected using IPCP. Did you shut and no shut the
interfaces to have them renegotiate PPP?
J3
>From: mani poopal <mani_ccie@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: mani poopal <mani_ccie@yahoo.com>
>To: Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>, Brian McGahan
><bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ppp authentication and ip address negoitated
>Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:27:13 -0800 (PST)
>
>Hi Brian & Tim,
>Thanks for the replies. Brian I enabled peer neighbor route. Still the
>same and getting quite interesting. I am attaching show run/show ip int
>brief/show ip route and ping output from both the router. Can you see what
>is the mistake and should this config work.
>======================================
>r3#show run int s 0/1
>Building configuration...
>Current configuration:
>!
>interface Serial0/1
> ip address 150.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip directed-broadcast
> encapsulation ppp
> peer default ip address 150.100.1.2
>end
>r3#i
>Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>Protocol
>Serial0/1 150.100.1.1 YES manual up up
>
>r3#show ip route
>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
>default
> U - per-user static route, o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static
>route
> T - traffic engineered route
>Gateway of last resort is not set
> 150.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
>C 150.100.1.2/32 is directly connected, Serial0/1
>C 150.100.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/1
>r3#ping 150.100.1.2
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.100.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>.....
>Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>r3#
>==========================================
>r8#show run int s 0/0
>Building configuration...
>Current configuration : 101 bytes
>!
>interface Serial0/0
> ip address negotiated
> encapsulation ppp
> no fair-queue
> clockrate 56000
>end
>r8#i
>Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>Protocol
>Serial0/0 150.100.1.2 YES IPCP up
>up
>
>r8#show ip route
>Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
>area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>Gateway of last resort is not set
> 150.100.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>C 150.100.1.2 is directly connected, Serial0/0
>
>r8#ping 150.100.1.1
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.100.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
>.....
>Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>r8#
>
>thanks
>
>Mani
>===========================================
>
>Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>Mani,
>Look into when you should and when you should not disable the
>"peer neighbor-route" command. In your situation, it should be left
>enabled. Just look at the routing table and you will see that you do
>not have a route to the remote router. The "peer neighbor-route"
>command will enable you to reach the remote router.
>
>Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
>bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 703
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 703
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>mani poopal
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:08 PM
>To: Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ppp authentication and ip address negoitated
>
>Brian I thought by disabling this feature, router will not istall a 32
>bit host route in the routing table. I thought it is a good idea to
>disable peer-neighbor route whenever you enable PPP.(may be it is ture
>only in a dialer watch situation). I would like to get your feedback.
>
>thanks
>
>Mani
>
>Brian McGahan wrote:
>Why did you disable peer neighbor-route? What exactly does this feature
>do?
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>________________________________________
>From: mani poopal [mailto:mani_ccie@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:13 PM
>To: mani poopal; Brian McGahan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ppp authentication and ip address negoitated
>
>Hi Brian,
>
>These are the output from both router. R8 router is getting ip address
>from IPCP(see the show ip int brief output). But I cannot ping the
>other router.
>
>Mani
>
>R8 ROUTER;
>interface Serial0/0
>ip address negotiated
>encapsulation ppp
>no peer neighbor-route
>no fair-queue
>clockrate 56000
>r8#show ip int brief
>Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
>Protocol
>Ethernet0/0 133.1.28.8 YES NVRAM up
>down
>Serial0/0 150.100.1.2 YES IPCP up
>up <--IPCP
>Loopback0 150.1.8.8 YES NVRAM up
>up
>========================================================================
>=========
>R3 ROUTER:
>interface Serial0/1
>ip address 150.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
>ip directed-broadcast
>encapsulation ppp
>peer default ip address 150.100.1.2
>r3#ping 150.100.1.2
>Type escape sequence to abort.
>Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.100.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>.....
>Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
>r3#
>r3#debug ppp negotiation-->Not getting any output
>========================================================================
>=========
>
>mani poopal wrote:
>Brian,
>
>I thought(seen) this on the previous workbook. But in the new work book
>you have corrected it and is right(lab3 isdn)[stacker-more cpu
>intensive, predictor-more memeory intensive]. Keep up your good
>work/workbook. Regarding ip address negotiated, I will again try this on
>back to back router lab and send the output.
>
>thanks
>
>Mani
>
>Brian McGahan wrote:
> > (1.)The practical studies vol 1 says to stacker is more cpu intensive
>and
> > predictor is more memory intensive(pg:303). I think from IEWB I
>studied
> > otherway around. Can somebody confirm
>
>This is correct. Predictor uses more memory because it has to store
>previous packet streams to make predictions on further ones. It should
>be listed this way in IEWB-RS; if it is not let me know and I'll take a
>look at it.
>
>For the second part post your config and "debug ppp negotiation" output.
>
>
>HTH,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>Of
> > mani poopal
> > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:47 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: ppp authentication and ip address negoitated
> >
> > Guys two small questions
> > (1.)The practical studies vol 1 says to stacker is more cpu intensive
>and
> > predictor is more memory intensive(pg:303). I think from IEWB I
>studied
> > otherway around. Can somebody confirm
> > (2.)in ppp encapsulation:
> > Is it possible to configrue 2 back to back routers with ppp
>encapsulation
> > and use "peer-default ip address x.x.x.x" on one router and "ip
>address
> > negotiated "on the other router. and see connectivity between these
>two
> > routers. I tried but is not working, in the router where ip address
> > negotiated was given, it shows ip address by ipcp but doesn't show the
>ip
> > address. And both interfaces shows up/down(I already checked the
>clock
> > rate). Any suggestion how the above commands works
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Mani
> >
> >
> > B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
> > (416)431 9929
> > MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
>(416)431 9929
>MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
>(416)431 9929
>MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>
>B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
>(416)431 9929
>MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
>(416)431 9929
>MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:26 GMT-3