From: loc.pham@comcast.net
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 14:31:56 GMT-3
IMHO, that is good to know, but the complexity of the lab itself already cause some of us " looping " gray hairs on our head, I would rather not using 12.2T/IPv6/2500 combination at all .
Well, may be just for BBs and something simples.
lp,
> Suuure , no problemo :) work just fine.
> Although there are some bugs I encountered , where e.g. there is no is-is on
> the interface , but after you type them anyway , the features appears :) but
> ... The ospf disapears for example ... Magic :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@netcogov.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:58 PM
> To: Gajewski Mariusz; Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>
> Apparently FN is wrong then. Although I've seen bugs where you can enter
> commands, but they won't stay. Can you actually configure the OSPF, and see
> it working?
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
> 1210 N. Parker Rd.
> Greenville, SC 29609
> Home office: 864-335-9473
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@netcogov.com
> PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gajewski Mariusz [mailto:Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: Church, Chuck; Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
> Wow! So it must be a miracle ;)
>
> BB1(config-if)#ipv6 ospf ?
> <1-65535> Process ID
> cost Interface cost
> database-filter Filter OSPF LSA during synchronization and
> flooding
> dead-interval Interval after which a neighbor is declared dead
> demand-circuit OSPF demand circuit
> flood-reduction OSPF Flood Reduction
> hello-interval Time between HELLO packets
> mtu-ignore Ignores the MTU in DBD packets
> neighbor OSPF neighbor
> network Network type
> priority Router priority
> retransmit-interval Time between retransmitting lost link state
> advertisements
> transmit-delay Link state transmit delay
>
> Soft : c2500-is-l.122-15.T9.bin
>
> With is-is I agree , there's nothing to look for on 25xx , but ipv6 ospf &
> rip work just fine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Church, Chuck
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:28 PM
> To: Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>
> Feature Navigator (www.cisco.com/go/fn) is the tool to use to solve these
> questions. Basic IPv6 is supported on the 2500s, but if you try to add
> OSPFv3, you'll see the 2500 support go away. It needs more memory.
>
>
> Chuck Church
> Lead Design Engineer
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
> 1210 N. Parker Rd.
> Greenville, SC 29609
> Home office: 864-335-9473
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@netcogov.com
> PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Amit
> Jain
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:37 AM
> To: Thorne, Gene
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
> Gene
>
> I used Cisco CCO login to find on Software Advisor that 2500 series IP Plus
> images do support IPV6 and some services. Not sure how much is sufficient
> for CCIE or whether they will have full command set or not. But definitely
> they support and need 16/16 RAM and Flash
>
> Amit
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 Gene
> Thorne wrote :
> >I searched the archives, but I could not find the previous
> email from Bruce about v6 images for the 2500. If such images do exist,
> which ones are they? I was under the impression that there were no v6 images
> for the 2500, but maybe I missed the reference.
> >-gt
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Ralph
> >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM
> >To: abcaslow@netmasterclass.net
> >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
> >
> >
> >Thanks for the info. Andy!! Now I can get the dust off some of my old
> 2500s,
> and put them to some good use.
> >
> >And actually, Andy, I'm one of those
> numerous friends of yours that you have not actually met. Your book has been
> very useful in my CCIE prep.
> >
> >Thanks again
> >Ralph
> >
> >-----Original
> Message-----
> > From: "Andrew B. Caslow" <abcaslow@netmasterclass.net>
> >To:
> "'Ralph'" <Mandela@myrealbox.com>
> >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:27:48 -0500
> >Subject: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
> >
> >Whoop, Sorry Ralph! I thought you
> were a friend of mine. I apologize for
> >responding to your e-mail as if your
> name was "Raj".
> >
> >I think you will find the contents of my previous e-maul
> useful. As I
> >mentioned, there are images for the 2500 platform that run v6.
> Good luck in
> >your studies.
> >
> >I hope all is well.
> >
> >-Bruce Caslow CCIE #3139
> > NetMasterClass, LLC
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> > From:
> nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >Ralph
> >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:54 AM
> >To: netsteps@rediffmail.com
> >Cc:
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
> >
> >You
> definitely a few 2600's. I do not think the 2500's can run the IPv6
> >code, and
> some of the new features in 12.2T.
> >
> >R.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> > From:
> netsteps@rediffmail.com
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005
> 01:10:27 -0500
> >Subject: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
> >
> >Hey all
> >
> >I am about
> to purchase my home lab for scheduled CCIE Lab. Please advise me
> >the
> drawbacks of using all 2500's in my home rack instead of 2600's.
> >One
> difference I noted is that the 2500's can run IP plus as highes feature
> >set.
> They dont come with Enterprise Plus, while 2600 can be configured with
> >both
> feature sets. Is their something extra that wont be there in IP plus
> >for 2500
> that i may require for CCIE.
> >
> >Amit
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:26 GMT-3